Flowers for Algernon and The Garden of Eden Essay

Daniel Keyes’s anecdotal story, â€Å"Flowers for Algernon†, drew on topics, examples of occasions, and character types from the Biblical story of the Garden of Eden. The two stories had a common subject: Ignorance is euphoria. The two stories additionally shared a comparable example of occasions. Charlie Gordon, the hero in â€Å"Flowers for Algernon†, and Adam and Eve, the principle characters in the Garden of Eden, all began in a condition of guiltlessness, unconscious of insidiousness, until they were urged to get more brilliant. After they had picked up insight, their eyes were opened to the entirety of the disagreeableness on the planet, and they endured the results. There were additionally likenesses in the characters in the two stories, for example, between the Serpent and Miss Kinnian and among Eve and Algernon. Daniel Keyes rendered the material new by changing the setting, the characters, and the occasions of the story to something significantly more p resent day. In â€Å"Flowers for Algernon†, Charlie needed to get brilliant, yet once he did, he understood that individuals used to ridicule him, and the vast majority quit conversing with him as regularly as they used to, either on the grounds that they were frightened of him or couldn’t get him. Algernon kicked the bucket, and Charlie lost the entirety of his insight. In the Garden of Eden, God cautioned Adam and Eve not to eat from the tree of the information on great and underhandedness, yet they didn’t tune in. The snake persuaded Eve to eat the illegal organic product, and afterward Eve persuaded Adam to eat it too. At the point when they ate the natural product, they picked up information and insight, got mindful of evilness, and acknowledged they were exposed. God sentenced them to an existence of anguish and in the long run demise. The basic topic of these two stories is obliviousness is joy. Some of the time it’s preferable to know nothing over something. The example of occasions in â€Å"Flowers for Algernon† reflect those of the Garden of Eden. In the Garden of Eden, God made Adam and Eve. They were totally guiltless and unadulterated, yet not great. God cautioned them not to eat from the tree of the information on great and malice. The insidious snake persuaded Eve to eat the illegal organic product at any rate. At the point when Adam and Eve ate from the tree of information, their eyes were opened, and they picked up information and intelligence, yet they were likewise presented to malice, and they felt exposed. Their condition of blamelessness was lost. At the point when God got some answers concerning this, He rebuffed Adam and Eve. In â€Å"Flowers for Algernon†, Charlie Gordon had an inability and needed insight. Miss Kinnian convinced Charlie to proceed with the activity. He consented to experience the medical procedure that the specialists thought would significantly increase his knowledge, despite the fact that he knew about the dangers in question. The activity made Charlie staggeringly keen, yet it additionally made him mindful that individuals ridiculed him. At a certain point, Charlie expressed that he felt as though he was stripped. His knowledge in the long run crumbles, and Algernon passes on. In the two stories, the fundamental characters start off in a condition of numbness, are convinced to expand their insight, choose to pick up information, in spite of realizing the dangers in question, and afterward they need to pay dearly. A portion of the characters in â€Å"Flowers for Algernon† and the Garden of Eden are fundamentally the same as. For instance, Charlie, Adam, and Eve are comparable on the grounds that they are the fundamental characters, they began in a condition of obliviousness, and they all got information. Furthermore, the snake and Miss Kinnian are indistinguishable on the grounds that the two of them convinced the fundamental characters to get more brilliant. Finally, Eve and Algernon were both the principal characters to obtain information. Daniel Keyes rendered the material new by changing the setting, the characters, and the occasions. The Garden of Eden occurred first and foremost, while â€Å"Flowers for Algernon† occurred in the twentieth century. Rather than a talking snake urging someone to eat otherworldly organic product, Daniel Keyes utilized Miss Kinnian to convince Charlie to do the activity. Thirdly, in the Garden of Eden, the taboo natural product offered information to Adam and Eve, however in Flowers for Algernon, an activity caused Charlie to turn out to be increasingly insightful. Topics, examples of occasions, and character types found in Flowers for Algernon reflect those found in the Biblical story of the Garden of Eden. The narratives both offer a similar topic: Ignorance is rapture. The two of them have comparative examples of occasions: The primary characters begin in a condition of blamelessness and numbness, at that point they are convinced to expand their knowledge. The fundamental characters concurred, regardless of the dangers in question. The primary characters needed to confront the outcomes of accepting information. Adam, Eve, and Charlie, the snake and Miss Kinnian, and Eve and Algernon all mirror one another. Daniel Keyes modernized the Biblical story of the Garden of Eden by evolving theâ setting, the characters, and the occasions, in spite of the fact that the general subject, examples of occasions, and sorts of characters are comparative in the two stories.